If for no other reason other than boredom, I decided to give Microsoft's advertisment publishing system a try on a real web site. OK, well, boredom and the fact they sent me a real cool stainless steel water bottle the other day.I had previously tried it on a lower traffic site and had terrible results. No money, few ads and generally blown off by the support team. I figured Id' give it a good test on one of my higher traffic sites...and one that performs very well with Google AdSense.
To test, rather than simply replace AdSense, I figured I'd run an A/B test and show them at random in the higher traffic areas of a popular web site. The results have still been disappointing, but not as disappointing as before.
On this site I am, at least, seeing ads, which is more than I saw on my first test. The first test rarely even produced ads and support told me I didn't have enough textual content to produce keywords, which was laughable at best. This new test I get ads all the time, which is a step in the right direction. The problem is that at best half of the ads are actually related to the content.
I find it interesting though, that it appears that Microsoft's system does pay a bit more per click, but, due to the inaccuracy of the ads, the clicks are far less (FAR less) so I am still making less than with AdSense. I have given it a few days, hoping it would improve, and the ads have improved, but not even close to as good as AdSense has been.
The net result is that AdSense is still doing better, but, if I could get a CTR with Microsoft like I do with AdSense, I'd be raking in the money!